daikiraikimi wrote:P_Tigras wrote:
When I think "masculine facial and body features" I think flat chest, straight hips, broad shoulders, more muscular arms, heavier, more pronounced brow, stronger jaw, and lots of facial and body hair. I don't mind the broad shoulders and stronger jaw so much, not all women are fragile-looking waifs, and thicker arms are ok as long as they retain a certain sleekness and don't get too blocky and veiny, but I'm sorry, when all the rest of those masculine features are added in, an image is created that I don't find particularly attractive. Not that I begrudge you such a character if you're into that, but I'm going to hop off the train at this point. I have nothing against physically strong women, but if they're going to be a romance interest for my characters, I'd still like them to look like women. So if she has a beard, then she's all yours.
Although I am sure that some people are attracted to super masculine looking females with body hair etc. that is simply not what bifauxnen is. Bifauxnen would resemble "pretty boys" more than "manly men."
Ahh, given that when I think "masculine", I think men, not boys, I was envisioning something quite a bit different than the pics you've shared with us. I'm not a big fan of the manga-style to begin with because of its tendency to exaggerate certain features to the point of absurdity, but I'll make some comments as we go
But if a bifauxnen is dressed in female clothes and looks the same as any other girl, her masculinity not shining through, it's just not the same. Here are some examples of the "aesthetic" I was talking about:
I have an issue with your definition of "masculinity", but I've already touched on that.
The important thing is 1. attitude and 2. aesthetic. My point is that, for instance, the pink haired girl above can only fit the criteria of bifauxnen when she is dressed in masculine clothes because her natural features are very feminine, and she has long hair. Bifauxnen range from more masculine to more feminine, but the entire point is that they must have some kind of masculine appeal both in personality and in looks. (You can't just put any woman in male clothes and call her bifauxnen, at least a little bit of androgyny and masculine charm is required. Otherwise it's just a girl in boys clothes.)
I don't have an issue with gals having attitude, or taking on "male" roles, or wearing "male" clothes. That's all fine, and even fun to me. But when the point of the aesthetic is to make them look like young boys my interest in them as romance interests disappears. Even women with "boyish" builds do not look exactly like boys, there are differences, and the more those differences are blurred, the less interested I am.
Also, doing things like emphasizing a female characters feminine characteristics, such as breasts or other fan service completely ruins the appeal. It's okay for the character to have breasts, etc, but it must be treated in a masculine fashion. (i.e. they can be there, but they shouldn't get too much attention, or be too sexualized as with female characters.)
feminine characteristics ruin the appeal?!?!?

Uhhh...I beg to differ. Clearly our perspectives on this subject are markedly different. I think women can look absolutely fabulous as women, not boys, in "male" clothing while performing "male" roles. They don't need to have D cups that look like they're about to explode out of their tops or otherwise stray into the realm of fan service to look good as women. Slender women with small chests and hips can be very attractive too with their sleeker builds, but that's not the same as having them look like boys. Thank you for the explanation of bifauxnen however.