development thread

Discuss the sequel to Planet Stronghold here
Post Reply
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

development thread

Post by jack1974 »

Where were we? Haha over 5 years after I started an overly enthusiast thread "the journey begins!" (lol) it seems that FINALLY the journey begins for real. Because what's better than starting a new RPG while I wait for the writer of another RPG??? (Cursed Lands)

Don't worry I'm not going to get burned out, I'm taking this easy. The most stressing part is actually the beta testing. So when CL beta enters the final stages (when people post pages of bugs) I'll take a break from PS2. But until now, I think is a good idea since my mind is fresh of RPG design and will be easier to remember how I coded the others.

For now I'm just fixing the GUI since the original one was used in PSCD:
Image

Then I'll proceed with the RPG design which will probably keep me busy for 2-3 months minimum. I'll reuse the same framework, since Anima unfortunately can't work on it as soon as needed, however I think it should be perfectly fine. People even liked the first game combat, so... this one should be better anyway I hope. I'm keeping the design notes Anima posted with some minor tweaks - for example I'm not going to keep the ammo thing, since after thinking carefully using ammo in a turn based game could make the battles too slow. There can be different ammo types but not the need to recharge the weapons.

About the story, as said elsewhere I'm going to write down the main plot as I code the game like I did with the first, and then with Miakoda's help will review/improve it and also do the romance routes (for that I'll probably let her do all the work and only suggest some ideas).

The original artist said could be available next Spring to do some more art, but I'm not sure if that will really happen. If does, good, I try to make good use of her skills :)

I honestly don't think will be out next year, but at least now I'm starting to work on it "seriously"!! :mrgreen:
User avatar
Callista
Young scout
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:12 am
Contact:

Re: development thread

Post by Callista »

Nice! I'm looking forward to PS2. I totally loved the first one. :D
Looking for a high quality editor? Then check out my page here: https://callista.itch.io/
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: development thread

Post by jack1974 »

This time should have a better writing too! :lol:
Troyen
Elder Druid
Posts: 957
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 2:23 am

Re: development thread

Post by Troyen »

Woo, it's been a long wait for this one!
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: development thread

Post by jack1974 »

Yes was probably one of the first games I announced back in 2011 I think. Though things are for the better: now I have a good RPG framework to use (yes it's still Loren/SOTW one, but I can use it to make a good sci-fi RPG) and my skills overall improved, Ren'Py is better (I can do more cool stuff easier now) and I have a writer/friend like Miakoda who will be a great help in editing/writing/helping with the story in general.

Haha I still have a prototype I made back in 2011 where my super RPG engine had the amazing new feature of... damaging multiple targets! Yes because the original game didn't have this feature :lol: Beside that, the framework I coded was using a mix of old/new Ren'Py code and could probably break if I tried to update it.

So I think it's actually better than I didn't finish that game back in 2012-2013 :mrgreen:
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: development thread

Post by jack1974 »

Image
class selection screen! Actually should say "sub-screen" since in this single screen you choose all the items on the left, Class, Previous Game Side, Existing Romance, Difficulty.
User avatar
Jaeger
Druid
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:30 am

Re: development thread

Post by Jaeger »

I thought you had some writing done for PS2 already. What happened?

I was really excited for the new RPG framework, but considering how long the game was delayed, I can respect that decision.
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: development thread

Post by jack1974 »

Yes some writing is done, but like 10-15% tops. Also since we're changing writer I need to see what to keep of the previous writing. It happens a lot that I had some writing for games and then had to restart from scratch because of writer change, I just never say it in public to avoid facepalm in mass :lol:
Seriously I'm surprised I manage to release more than 1 game a year (indeed 99% of other indies making big games release 1 every 2-3 years, it's not random :mrgreen:).

As for the framework, there was a prototype but wasn't finished. Then Anima was working on a new one which is much better and could work both for fantasy/sci-fi games (so melee+ranged attacks) but then 2 years ago had to pause it to do the card framework (which is not simple at all) and then had no time to go on. Since this game was announced so far away I really don't want to wait more.

There will be other RPGs in future that can use the new system :)
User avatar
jack1974
Pack leader
Posts: 15470
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: development thread

Post by jack1974 »

Image
more progress! Haha I love the art and the GUI, I think they fit well together. I'm not sure if to use the wording "Use / Can't Use" or something like "Pro / Cons". Though use it's probably more immediate.
Yes Soldiers can't use medikits, but it's not set in stone, I want to have the classes very different. But if turns out to be too much of a pain I'll change it of course.
User avatar
Jaeger
Druid
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:30 am

Re: development thread

Post by Jaeger »

"Can/Can't Use" is fine considering you are only mentioning equipment and ability use. "Pros/Cons" is more broad and can be used for describing things like HP pools, buffs, or crowd control.
Post Reply