Re: about this RPG
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:33 pm
Haha well the arena might be just a safe place to bring slaves back from the raid. A closed space where the captured people are immediately surrounded by the mercenaries 

In the original, Myrth and Amukiki's outfits bothered me while Loren's did not. Myrth's outfit struck me as highly unhygienic, and a tad skanky. Amukiki looked like a slab of man-meat on display, even as he trudged up and down snow-covered mountains. Loren's outfit, while revealing, didn't reveal as much as the other two's outfits.Madance wrote:Indeed. I was only saying an example, anyway. What I mean to say is to give an excuse for impractical armors. Myrth was a character that didn't bother at all, even in her sexy version, since she stated that didn't believe in clothes and all that, and I do find strange that she is suddenly dressed up in the covered version(but it's a lovely design, regardless).
The new armor doesn't look the least bit proper to me. In fact it looks to me like it would chafe. On the other hand I didn't consider the old outfit as armor at all. It looked like a revealing leather outfit to me. So I wasn't as hard on it.Loren, on the other hand, was a character that I could not even look in the uncovered version for long, she was using an impossible armor, so ridiculous small that made me disdain every commentary she made about going to battle. In the covered version, things got better(but not that much. She still is without a proper armor), and I only turned the suggestive content on the romance scenes.
Eh, I'm not a fan of Loren's new look. We'll have to agree to disagree on this.Now, the design of the armor of Loren in the sequel even in the sexy version was acceptable. Beautiful, and as Jack stated, could be used in a fantasy setting, with all that magic and what not. But still, if the covered version Loren is with more armor, I would be way more satisfied.
Agreed.I think someone had the idea of letting the player choose whose character to turn the covered version, then players could choose who would be with the sexy outfit and what not. I agree with the idea, since would give more freedom to the player.
Not as much as you might think. Plate armor (there's no such thing as plate mail) could weigh as little as 30 pounds (even lighter if you didn't want a full set) and went up to a maximum of about 100 pounds (these weren't for field use.) It depends on the thickness and the period it was made. I believe some later armor was made to be 'pistol proof', with corresponding thickness increase. But the really heavy armors were made for sporting purposes (jousting) and weren't used in the field.Greyreason wrote:Speaking of practicalities, one thing people often overlook about armor is the weight. There's a lot of it. Any amount of armor will hinder movement, especially for a woman, due to the comparative lack of muscle.